With no way to process it, US will bury 70,000 tons of nuclear waste

<Snip>
Reuters / Sergei Karpukhin

With two decades to go before it can reprocess spent nuclear fuel, the US will have to bury nearly 70,000 tons of it, a research lab reports. It comes after Congress and the Obama administration defunded a planned nuclear waste repository in 2011.
[link to www.occuworld.org]

The dirty little secret of "safe" nuclear power. Not one plant should be allowed to refuel until they have a long term plan for spent fuel.

Southern OR (GLP)
<end snip>

Just another day it seems for 'no-where-to-put-it', as sourced by the Author....

Remember this? Mechanical Destruction of Unit 4

Fukushi highly Irradiated forest opened to Cherry Blossom viewers...

<snip>
Or so it is hoped in Fukushima City.

The country was incomprehensible to the outside world for a long time. It has become incomprehensible even to some of its citizens after the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident.

The hills in question, Hanami-yama, are famous for cherry blossom trees, but they are also located in Watari District, the most contaminated district in Fukushima City. Professor Mori of Tokyo University picked up an earthworm in that district whose castings had 1.37 million becquerels/kg of radioactive cesium. That's also where the rice was harvested whose radioactive cesium exceeded 1,500 becquerels/kg.

According to Ministry of Education, as of now, the radiation level in the parking lot at the trail head is 0.528 microsievert/hour at 1 meter from the ground, a drop from about 0.7 microsievert/hour after decontamination done on what looks like January 13 and 14, 2013. However, the level has been creeping up again since.



<end snip>
Read more at EX-SKF

Would you go? I'd like to poll this one....

Cesium-134/137 amount in the atmosphere have not been changed since September of 2011

Posted by Mochizuki on January 31st, 2013 

According to CTBT, Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty’s radiation monitoring post in Takasaki Gunma, the amount of cesium-134/137 in the atmosphere have almost not been changed since September of 2011.

Last December, 64 μBq/m3 of Cs-134 and 107 μBq/m3 of Cs-137 were measured at average.

Related article..65 μSv/h on the snow in Fukushima [URL]

http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/130110Takasaki_report_Dec31.pdf

http://ad9.org/blog/nuclear/CTBTtakasaki12.pdf

http://pegasus1.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2013-01-29

Iori Mochizuki

Full article/ translation/ original links at Fukushima-Diary

http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/01/cesium-134137-amount-in-the-atmosphere-have-not-been-changed-since-september-of-2011/

Share on email

California Slammed With Fukushima Radiation

Fair use under public safety:

the following: please check link below for webpage:

<snippets>

California Slammed With Fukushima Radiation

 

By Barry Ritholtz - March 31st, 2012, 11:30PM

Fukushima Radiation Plume Hit Southern and Central California

The Journal Environmental Science and Technology reports in a new study that the Fukushima radiation plume contacted North America at California “with greatest exposure in central and southern California”, and that Southern California’s seaweed tested over 500% higher for radioactive  iodine-131 than anywhere else in the U.S. and Canada:

Projected paths of the radioactive atmospheric plume emanating from the Fukushima reactors, best described as airborne particles or aerosols for 131I, 137Cs, and 35S, and subsequent atmospheric monitoring showed it coming in contact with the North American continent at California, with greatest exposure in central and southern California. Government monitoring sites in Anaheim (southern California) recorded peak airborne concentrations of 131I at 1.9 pCi m−3

Anaheim is where Disneyland is located.
EneNews summarizes the data:

Corona Del Mar (Highest in Southern California)

• 2.5 Bq/gdwt (gram dry weight)= 2,500 Bq/kg of dry seaweed
  

Santa Cruz (Highest in Central California)

• 2.0 Bq/gdwt = 2,000 Bq/kg of dry seaweed

Simon Fraser University in Canada also tested North American seaweed after Fukushima:

• “In samples of dehydrated seaweed taken on March 15 near the North Vancouver SeaBus terminal, the count was zero; on March 22 it was 310 Bq per kilogram; and by March 28 it was380 Bq/kg.” -Vancouver Sun
• Seaweed in Seattle also tested positive for iodine-131; levels were not reported -KIRO
• No results after March 28 were reported

In addition, radioactive debris is starting to wash up on the Pacific Coast. And because the Japanese are burning radioactive materials instead of disposing of them, radioactive rain-outs will continue for some time … even on the Pacific Coast.
Of course, the government is doing everything it can to help citizens cover up what’s occurring. We pointed out in January:

Instead of doing much to try to protect their citizens from Fukushima, Japan, the U.S. and the EUall just raised the radiation levels they deem “safe”.
Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen says that high-level friends in the State Department told him that Hillary Clinton signed a pact with her counterpart in Japan agreeing that the U.S. will continuebuying seafood from Japan, despite that food not being tested for radioactive materials [see this].
And the Department of Energy is trying to replace the scientifically accepted model of the dangers of low dose radiation based on voodoo science. Specifically, DOE’s Lawrence Berkeley Labs used a mutant line of human cells in a petri dish which was able to repair damage from low doses of radiation, and extrapolated to the unsupported conclusion that everyone is immune to low doses of radiation….

Indeed:

American and Canadian authorities have virtually stopped monitoring airborne radiation, and are not testing fish for radiation. (Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by raising “acceptable” radiation levels.)
So – as in Japan – radiation is usually discovered by citizens and the handful of research scientists with funding to check, and not the government. See this, this, this, this, this and this.
The Japanese government’s entire strategy from day one has been to cover up the severity of the Fukushima accident. This has likely led to unnecessary, additional deaths.
Indeed, the core problem is that all of the world’s nuclear agencies are wholly captured by the nuclear industry … as are virtually all of the supposedly independent health agencies.
So the failure of the American, Canadian and other governments to test for and share results is making it difficult to hold an open scientific debate about what is happening.

And it’s not just radiation from Japan.  An effort by the Southern California Edison power company tosecretly ramp up production to avoid public disclosure may have led to a leak at the San Onofre nuclear power plant.
And see these articles on California radiation exposure courtesy of EneNews:

• Anaheim, CA has highest amount of radioactive fallout of any EPA air monitoring station in Continental U.S. for iodine-131
• Over EPA limit: Cesium levels in San Francisco area milk now higher than 6 months ago
• USGS: Los Angeles area had highest cesium deposition in US after Fukushima
• “Tends to concentrate in the testicles”: 360+ atoms of radioactive sulfur per day may have been inhaled by Californians after Fukushima
• Unprecedented Spike: 1501 atoms of radioactive sulfur per meter³ was detected in California air
• Radioactive sulfur in California spiked to highest levels ever detected: University researchers
• Controversy after US gov’t estimate showed 40,000 microsievert thyroid dose for California infants from Fukushima — Data not released to public — “Very high doses to children”
• Spike in radiation levels for West Coast? “Abnormal” readings on 8 of 18 EPA monitors for California, Oregon, Washington — Devices now “undergoing quality review”
• Nuclear policy expert: “Striking” that radioactive iodine-131 in California rainwater is so far above level permitted in drinking water
• Uranium-234 detected in Hawaii, Southern California, and Seattle

PERMALINK 

<end snip>

follow pages here:

The chairman of the Fukushima accident council, “There’s no appropriate solution for reactor4″

Admission of End Game?

<snip>

Posted by Mochizuki on January 31st, 2013

On 1/30/2013, the Fukushima accident council was held to evaluate the progress of Tepco’s decommissioning.
Mr. Kurokawa, the chairman of the governmental accident investigation committee commented the SFP of reactor4 is the crisis in front of us. The entire world is concerned about that.
[b]
Mr. Kitazawa, the chairman of the council stated it takes a while to remove all the spent fuel from the pool. There is no appropriate solution for that.[/b]

<end snip>

Translation and full article

not that we weren't yelling from the mountains...

Nice.. results from children nearly 50%... so we'll stop testing so as not to cause the dreaded stress.....

Cesium from the urine of 40% of the children in Iwate, “Considering to stop the research anymore”

Last April, Fukushima Diary reported cesium was measured from the urine of 119 among 132 children in Iwate. [URL 1]

The second survey was conducted from last October to January. The result showed they still measured cesium from the urine of 35 among 86 children.

1 ~ 2 Bq/ 2L (The amount of urine per a day) : 3 children
~1 : 32 children
Not detected : 51 children

full article/ translation

Fukushima-Diary

Thyroid Cysts and Nodules in Fukushima Children Increasing

Ian continues to film in Fukushima with the focus of his work on the increasing number of children found to have thyroid cysts and nodules.  He has just come back from a week of filming in the cities of Fukushima and Date in Fuksuhima, and his blog posts about what he discovered can be found here:
http://www.documentingian.com/blog/2012/11/10/thyroid-cysts-and-nodules-in-fukushima-children-increasing/

Ian is currently editing this recent footage and plans to return to Fukushima on December 16th to continue filming.

Tsunami: The Survivors' Stories (Documentary)

NUCLEAR GENOCIDE 

Since 1986 when one 185 ton nuclear fuel reactor exploded there has been millions of people die all from the nuclear contamination this one reactor unleashed. They called this nuclear disaster Chernobyl

Death toll estimate from Chernobyl now around 1.5 Million. The worst of chernobyl wont be seen till 20 generation so it still has a lot of killing to do. Once nuclear isotopes are released they can never be cleaned up. Chernobyl was a very terrible disaster for the whole world but now there is Fukushima that is 100s of times bigger then Chernobyl.... the world will never be the same. we must help put a end to the nuclear genocide the nuclear industry is causing to the world before it ends humanity.
http://enenews.com/expert-death-toll-estimate-chernobyl-around-15-million-people-video 

Chernobyl compared to Fukushima... 80% of fukushima went over the pacific ocean to canada and usa because of the east word jet stream of air flow in the northern hemisphere.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151335280803245&set=t.619858244&type=3&theater

chernobyl 185 tons nuclear fuel, one rector with core material only. caped in 12 to 14 days sealed with metal sarcophagus a little under a year, contaminated 77,000 sq/miles and to this day has killed 1.5 million people and 7 million people are effected but the worst wont be seen until 20 generations down the line so Chernobyl hasn't even started doing it worst damage to humanity yet. 

Fukushima 1700 plus tons nuclear fuel, 4 reactors explode 3 externally 1 internally (reactor 2 exploded in the turbine building so its been leaking to sea uncontrollably to this very day), 40 years spent fuel (spent fuel million times more toxic then core material ), MOX plutonium in rector 3 which was the biggest explosion (MOX plutonium is recycled spent fuel and is 2 million times more toxic the core material), These were ocean cooled rectors and will continue to forever pollute the sea until a technology is developed to deal with the melted nuclear lava.

Air sampling showed people in Seattle usa breathed 5 to 10 hot particles a day in april 2011

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151416146788245&set=vb.619858244&type=3&theater

The radiation level in tokyo is above evacuation level for Chernobyl .... There is 30 million people in Tokyo 

Up to 1,300,000,000 people have died because of the nuclear fission: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browsePages.do?issue=5368&size=3&pageLabel=408

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia covered – Missing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

“For if it is scandalous to die, it is even more scandalous when the traces of the dead degenerate into the death of all traces.” Atomic Industry = Invisible War:http://www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/philosophy/images/pdf/Paul_JOBIN/ThebaudMony-PrefaceEnglishEd.pdf

In studies, there are control groups and patients. Soon there will no longer control groups, illness will become normal. For example: In Switzerland each 2nd death is caused by cancer.

If natural radiation has influenced the evolution, what happens when we add artificial radiation? With radionuclides, which did not exist before the atomic age?
The answer: Atomic Darwinism

“We are constantly being told about a ‘permissible amount of radiation.’ Who permitted it? Who has any right to permit it?” Albert Schweitzer http://icanw.org/1957

When did the atomic age start? Maybe 1927:http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/resources/timeline/1927_Muller.php

quote: “He also supported “positive” eugenics…”

Emmy Stein generated 1921 with Radium hereditary carcinomas in Antirrhinum plants:http://books.google.de/books?id=gPrtE4K0WC8C&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143&dq=Antirrhinum+radium+Emmy+Stein+1922&source=bl&ots=8EDd9LgkVF&sig=SqeLMTtx98h7aD5LLc_qAtJN3nY&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Antirrhinum%20radium%20Emmy%20Stein%201922&f=false

In 1914 Thomas Boveri found that Genomic Instability causes Cancer – :http://jcs.biologists.org/content/121/Supplement_1/1.full

quote: “existence of cancers produced by X-rays”

2011 & 2012: Mutatad Butterflies:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/

Thomas Boveri was a very good friend of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen - the man who discovered the invisible X-Rays:http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1901/rontgen-bio.html and: http://www.uni-kiel.de/anorg/lagaly/group/klausSchiver/roentgen.pdf

Genomic Instability is caused by Internal Emitters in the body, from irradiated food, by man made nuclear fission.

“The genomic instability is passed on in the genes and increases exponentially with each generation“:http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

The Nuclear Holocaust Industry:https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/nuclear-cancer-industry/

“Many (not all) cancer biologists now believe that genomic instability “not only initiates carcinogenesis, but also allows the tumor cell to become metastatic and evade drug toxicity”http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GenomicInst.html

The Nazis persecuted long the possibility of a new master race called Aryans. Part of it was the “Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring” from July 14th 1933: http://www.documentarchiv.de/ns/erbk-nws.html This was signed by “Federal Chamber of Physicians Germany”! Source:http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/page.asp?his=0.2.23.5168.5283.5373.5374 The law was outlawed at first 2006!

They built engines of destruction, where the Jews were brutally murdered, beyond imagination. But the Jews were part and are of the German population. So, it was a war against its own people. Murdered were inter alia people with disabilities, vulnerable groups, dissidents, opposition figures, and so on. The aim was to continue this campaign throughout Europe, Russia, the whole world. Should arise anywhere a concentration camp, large parts of the population would and have been be destroyed.

Eugenics as a guiding influence within the ICRP:http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/eugenics-as-a-guiding-influence/

ICRP and their cancer drugs: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/councilor-of-radiation-is-led-by-a-pharmaceutical-company-and-icrp/

The goal was a residual population of a controlled accetable rest amount for production, reproduction and defense. Under the centralized, self-regenerating elite.

The future goal was the barbaric eugenics:http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html. So, the NAZIS were very intersted in genetics, to create a superiour race. Mengele was Hitler’s main man for this:http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007060

Where the NUCLEAR fire was started – The German Nuclear Reactor at Haigerlochhttp://www.chymist.com/The%20German%20Nuclear%20Reactor.pdf

But today, they invented modern “concentration camps”: The atomic reactors. They don’t kill us fast. But they kill millions in a lifetime (70) – and they simply lower the chance for healthy born children.

“Otto Hahn, Heisenberg and von Weizsäcker did not achieve the 1st nuclear explosion, but Diebner. He was the first one, in 1945 in Thüringen (Germany)- and succeded with a “small” nuclear explosion in the concentration Camp. Prisoners were used as experimental subjects and killed.” SOURCE:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/the-money-machine-atomic-power-67-e-per-kwh/ and:http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_05_436_S01-03.pdf

EXAMPLE: In 1985, a year before the Chernobyl disaster, 200 cases of malformations were recorded. In 2000, over 800 cases, however, despite a substantial decline in births: currently 14 to 15 000 births / year, against 28 to 30 000 before the Chernobyl disaster! http://www.dissident-media.org/infonucleaire/trait_25_26.html / page 2: “Anencephaly, severe spina bifida cystica, cleft lips
and/or palate, polydactyly, reduction limb defects leading to disability, esophageal atresia, anorectal atresias, Down’s syndrome and multiple malformations are registered both in stillborns and in fetuses obtained through induced abortion after prenatal diagnostics. The results are presented in Table 2 for the 137Cs contaminated areas and for the control.” quote and scan from:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf - ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Chernobyl: Development failures in the NEWBORN:http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Lazyuk-ChernobylBelarus.pdf According to Michel Fernex (former WHO, Switzerland) The IAEA said in 1996: “Because there was no register in Belarus for malformations BEFORE Chernobyl, there are no abnormalities.” A LIE, not logic, unethic and unsicentific. – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Results of Long-term Genetic Monitoring of Animal Populations Chronically
Irradiated in the Radiocontaminated Areashttp://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:

http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

1928 the ICRP was founded. No coincidence:http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=1928+Recommendations

the ICRP kills 150,000 people per year with irradiated food standards:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

CANCER IS MUTATION

I think that increased thyroid cancer incidence of children from irradiated parents would be first manifestation of the induced genomic instability:http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Rosa Goncharova‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital Minsk, she directs the laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belorussian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the research professor and her team investigated the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation.

What harm take people living in contaminated areas?

“Must live”, because there are 2600 villages that should relocate. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies (in german):

http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x

TRANSLATION

“One of the main lessons learned from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is now proven. They produce damage in the body cells and in the sex cells. Even at a low dose of less than 100 micro Sievert and even years at a tolerated dose of one millisievert were identified in our laboratory genetic changes.”

“About one Milllisievert per year: This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work professionally with ionizing radiations. For occupationally exposed persons in Europe are higher limits. The research team has identified mutations, ie changes in the genes of the nucleus.”

“Man, like every other living being possesses, protection systems, the repair such mutations almost. If there is now under the influence of radioactivity additional mutations, the organism will be charged additionally, he must also fight against it.”

“For these children we have found changes in individual genes. And the worst part is that these children show an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more frequently than others. Among the unfavorable factors include poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This is true not only for children but for adults too. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.”

“In plain English: who spends his life in contaminated areas spend, must, whose immune system is weakened.”

Radioactivity, as it opens the doors for other health problems.

The most dangerous radiation is which is ingested with food. Thus, for example, cesium-137 from the inside acts on the cells, because it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or strontium-90, a radionuclide that accumulates in the bone and bone marrow: there it can damage blood cells and can cause cancer such as blood cancer.”

- On the question of whether changes in the genetic inheritance of future generations, says geneticist Rose Goncharova: “We demonstrated in our laboratory for the first time that genetic changes over generations may be swept on. We have found after Chernobyl more than 22 animal generations of genetic instability. There are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have been scientifically proven.”

“This has been proven in one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were well comparable with those of humans, says the researcher. Therefore one can transmit many findings to him.”

“Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited. The radioactivity is harmful. So it happens that many offspring do not survive or even many embryos. Those who survive are somehow cope with the situation. But whose genome is unstable, and they also pass into the next generation. And often they are ill. Their whole system is more unstable than in other animals.”

“The mortality rate in these animals is very, very high. Mice produce very many offspring, and therefore they can afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. In any case, not five, six, seven at once. He also does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can also transmit the results that actually would be transferable to humans, not in all respects to him.”

“Which low doses of radiation effects in humans may have, but points to a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany. It states: Within a radius of 35 km around a nuclear plant are fewer girls were born in areas without nuclear power. We investigated the surroundings of 27 facilities in Germany and four in Switzerland. Fewer female births have been noted previously: In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation. It is believed that female embryos are more sensitive to radiation and therefore die rather than male.”

Incidence of Obligatory Registered Malformations in Belarus for 1982 to 1995 (per 1000 neonates) PAGE 3:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf – quote: “The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32 – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Increased sex ratio in Bavaria (Germany):
after Chernobyl and in the vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants -
epidemiological findings:http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Look for infertility after Chernobyl: “Primary infertility in the contaminated areas increased 5.5-fold in 1991 compared with 1986″ and “Impotence in young men (ages 25 to 30 years) correlated with the level of radioactive
contamination in a territory” page 118:http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“The level of alpha-radionuclides is significantly higher in bone tissue of aborted fetuses from mothers from the contaminated territories” – page 119.


What we have today, is the slow motion atomic holocaust. This is how it works:

Atomic industry and atomic catastrophes increased the mutation rate. In the early future “normal” people (like us) have a lower chance of a non disabled child or viable, as a “protected” elite has. This is the genetic clean out. It is based upon the Autosomal recessive modes of inheritance, because low irradiated food becomes high irradiated food / atomic waste, in the body and fires at the DNA, causes mutations. The mutation rate is increased by it. If “altered” partners fall in love and get a child, it is likely to be disabled, ill, not healthy. This is the principle they found out. One can say: Wait, mutation rates were always there, caused by natural background radiation <- that’s right, but radioactive Cesium, Strontium or Radio-Iodine weren’t there, before the atomic age. The act like natural elements. Your body don’t get the trick:

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf – quote: “Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 are
advised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal.” PAGE 5 – Now, artificial radiation makes us and our children even more mortal.

More: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/

It is an artificial evolution. How it started (supported by the United Nations):

In 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and living being with “The Peaceful Atom” (because it kills peaceful!):http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhoweratomsforpeace.html the agenda was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing:http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/1/newsid_2781000/2781419.stm which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE:http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/natcisoe/2011%20EPRI%20ISOE%20Conference%20Brochure.pdf.pdf page 5 “Plenary Session: Nuclear Power’s Mandate for Safe, Efficient and ALARA Operating Philosophy.http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/natcisoe/symposiumpapers/2003/2003SymposiumAgenda.pdfIt’s magic, it’s “ICRP proven”.

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

An example: quote “as far as is practically achievable”:http://enformable.com/2011/09/scottish-nuclear-leak-will-never-be-completely-cleaned-up/

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf
basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning (before the h bomb test) the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954): http://books.google.de/books?id=MHWEk6wZc10C&pg=RA1-PA139&dq=ICRP+ALARA+1973&hl=de&ei=yopBTvnUFNGdOpvpuagJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false quote “…economic and social…” ETHIC is missing! – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents.The ICRP also says the set of radiation levels for anticipated activities should be determined by cost-benefit analysis. Your health is a cost-benefit issue during a atomic catastrophe. Basically this means: When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation. This is the true aim!

No later than 1957 the UN was the protector of the “peaceful murderous atom”: The founding of the IAEA. And 1959 with the gagging of the WHO:http://independentwho.info/WHA_12_40_EN.php?sous_menu=onu



Nuclear holocaust – funded by the state:

20-30 km exclusion zone lifted around Fukushima
Russian “Atomic Darwinism” article:http://nmnby.eu/news/analytics/3172.html translation:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/atomic-darwinism/


Oppenheimer and many other NAZIS were imported to the U.S. to continue their atomic program, of an ultimate weapon, which kills fast and reliable. Let’s quote Oppenheimer:

“For I am become death, the destroyer of worlds”
Robert Oppenheimer (father of the first nuclear weapons test) – Source: http://independentwho.info/histoire_EN.php/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8H7Jibx-c0

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE.http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

Dwight Eisenhower advised AEC (NRC): “Keep the Public confused about Fission and Fusion.”http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19790423&id=nXUjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lmcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6981%2C3863905

But many stayed in Germany, led the “peaceful” atomic program: Germany’s nuclear research: Founded by the NAZIS:

The Nuclear Resarch Center or Institute for Nuclear and Energy Engineering (Institut für Kern- und Energietechnik (IKET) http://www.iket.kit.edu/index.php) is working on TRANSMUTATION, which is an instrument to revive the dangerous Plutonium fast breeder reactors – MOX – also at Fukushima: http://www.inr.kit.edu/english/264.phpPartners of the project:http://www.nurisp.eu/www/nurisp/index.php?art=37

-> Alfred Boetcher Scientific Director Nuclear Research Center Jülich, 1960 to 1966. Before 1945, director of Degussa and SS commander in Leiden, Holland. More:http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf – quote: “The convicted SS Lieutenant-Colonel of Leiden (Netherlands), Alfred Boettcher was, from 1960 to 1966 President of the Nuclear Research Centre
Jülich and was responsible for building links with the apartheid state of South Africa and responsible for the military dictatorship in Brazil.”

There is high radiation caused in the research reactor “Jülich” map near the town “Karlsruhe”. In the 1970ies few scandals happened there and they need to be inspected again. Jülich came into service in 1963. It is a pebble bed reactor. It went offline in 1978 after the worst case scenario nearly happend. Source

The moderator inside of Jülich is Graphit – just like in Chernobyl. The electric output was 15 MW. Due to it’s high radiation it is not possible to transfer the reactor into a waste disposal. Jülich is under a sarcophagus – for the next hundred years. It’s Germany’s Micro-Chernobyl. More:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/high-radiation-in-german-reactor/

-> William Groth, employs in Jülich in the 1960s, director of the Institute of Physics and Chemistry in Bonn and a member of the Board of the German Atomic Forum. 1936-1945 Political leader of the NSDAP and staff at the Army Ordnance Department on the atomic bomb project. More:http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf quote: “The Nazi leader Wilhelm Groth research before 1945 under the Nazis to the atomic bomb in order to continue the war in Jülich.”

-> Walter Schnurr 1956 to 1970 Scientific Director of the Nuclear Research Center Karlsruhe and mediator in the construction of military Atucha reactor in Argentina, worked in 1945 as a weapons specialist at IG Farben (manufacturers of Zyklon B poison gas against Jews:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben) MORE:http://books.google.de/books?id=KAsAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=walter+Schnurr++karlsruhe+nazi&source=bl&ots=SO2aySjqrf&sig=OwoPcPMBTop4QCPQeeREDMdgdT0&hl=de&ei=2dYzTpqOJ8zLtAak1cG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=walter%20Schnurr%20%20karlsruhe%20nazi&f=false

# Sources: german magazine lunapark21 12/2011, p.46 (http://www.lunapark21.net/) & literature: Holger Strohm, Friedlich in die Katastrophe. Eine Dokumentation über Atomkraftwerke, Frankfurt 1981, S. 886:http://www.amazon.de/Friedlich-Katastrophe-Eine-Dokumentation-Atomkraftwerke/dp/3894017481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1312018768&sr=8-1



ATOMIC POWER IS THE NEW FASCISM:

They recognized that nuclear weapons will kill quickly and warlike, are too conspicuous. The peaceful atom, however, needs a long time to kill (latency). It kills peaceful as the name implies. And clean. And without evidence (Iodine 131 has a half life of 8 days, is particularly effective in children and unborn babies).

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946 for this!http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies:http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and:http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

Discovered by Abraham Petkau, 1972, Whitshell at the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (web).

His study:http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v71-196

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

Trisomy increase by Chernobyl:http://aweb2u.free.fr/dotclear/index.php?post%2F2012%2F03%2F04%2FTrisomie-en-Belarus

Sources:

> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

Prepare YOURSELF with this easy to understand study-consumption: LOW RADIATON is MORE DANGEROUS than some HIGH RADIATION: The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf



Let’s take CESIUM and STRONTIUM:

Half-life is only so that half of the radiation is gone. You have every half-life multiplied by ten in order to have an idea when this radioisotope is gone from the biological environment. That would be in strontium and cesium 400 years.

STRONTIUM-90 IN BABY TEETH AS A FACTOR IN EARLY CHILDHOOD CANCER:http://www.radiation.org/reading/ijhs/ijhs_methods.htmland: An unexpected rise in strontium-90 in US deciduous teeth in the
1990s:http://stopfplnow.org/literature/Mangano_2003_Trends_Microbiol.pdf

Latency: 20 – 25 years mature people / 4 years children (Chernobyl happens grows today, illness, death, cancer increase and not decrease, as WHO and IAEA say)

This is the upturned pyramid. The cesium is biological similar to the potassium and the human body can not distinguish between the good potassium and cesium.

The body takes it on the breath and the food. You can not protect yourself.

After intake, the cesium builds self into the body cells and destroys the energy balance of cells. It does not matter whether it consists of the liver, kidney or brain cells involved.

These infected cell dies, after she pulls even before their neighbors suffer.

Thus begins a weird cycle:

How life begins with a cell starts in this case the death. Children are more vulnerable because their cells divide constantly.

As they grow, they need constant energy and constant need to cope with the damage to their cells.

25 years with Chernobyl:

The adults at that time have survived 25 years and are now ill. In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children.

Quiet Death.

The then children are already suffering much earlier – often with fatal consequences.

The cesium is present in the inheritance cells.

Precarious, is that the cesium implants in the ovaries and the eggs of women. Because they renew, they are damaged for life.

Although renewed in sperm, they also give more information to the injury during fertilization. Either, it can no longer be fathered children, or they get through father and mother misinformation in the future. The result you can not even imagine.

The authorities in Japan had long ago have put women and children in the south of the country. Why they did not is, in my view, totally incomprehensible. There will be massive leukemia. This cesium cloud is a disaster for the Japanese, and from all other radionuclides, we know nothing.

The body can not distinguish between Calcium and Strontium. If it is taken in through the food chain. It is built into the bones and teeth, shines there and hits the bone marrow, where sit the blood-forming organs: The stem cells that give rise to the red and white blood cells and platelets.

These cells are damaged by Strontium, and indeed a lifetime, because the strontium remains where it is: irradiating with short and beta radiation.

Nuclear Radiation and its Biological Effects:http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBEtoc.html



Please keep in Mind: “African American adults are more likely to be diagnosed with coronary heart disease, and they are more likely to die from heart disease” Source:http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/content.aspx?ID=3018

Heart and Cesium and Potassium: “Potassium is crucial to heart function and plays a key role in skeletal and smooth muscle contraction, making it important for normal digestive and muscular function” Source:http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/potassium-000320.htm

Anybody get the idea?

Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body: PAGE 2 – 3:http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf

MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf



Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother. http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling%3A+Biomolecular+sciences+90%2C000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters. CARBON 14 is a real danger. It natural and man made.

On April 25th 1953 the US tested an atomic bomb in Nevada:http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/18/nyregion/book-examines-nevada-test-that-left-fallout-in-troy-ny.htmlFallout and strong rain went down on New York, parts of Vermont and Masachusetts. Half a million people were affected. 270,000 micro curie were measured in the City “Troy”. The NRC standard is 100 micro curie. But the USAEC didn’t make epidemiological study. Chance missed, Nuclear 1, Humanity ZERO. 1962; Ralph E. Lapp, “Nevada Test Fallout and Radioiodine in Milk,”:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/137/3532/756.abstract

Child mortality from pneumonia and influenza was increased between 1950 and 1965 (http://www.independentwho.info/histoire_EN.php) by the atomic and h bomb fallout. Low radiation (Petkau Effect) damaged the immune system. So, children were killed by influenza and pneumonia: 400,000 dead children. After the atomic bomb test stop from 1963, the curve went down. See the US Vital Staistics:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm The bomb tests killed 2 – 3,000,000 children! Less rain ment less children mortality. Compare New Mexico.http://books.google.de/books?id=wAcAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA41#v=onepage&q&f=false

Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of German Nuclear Power Plants http://ippnw.org/pdf/mgs/6-1-korblein.pdf and:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/

This is proven also by the Bob Hopkins study from 1973. The Department of Public Health proved with the study of Kurihara “cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries japan society” from nov 1972 Tohoku /Japan, that there was an 600 % increase in children mortality of japanese chidren age 5 till 9 years, after the Hrioshima and Nagasaki atomic test.

No dictator has ever had so much power! To kill future generations!



World Health Organization
Japan Nuclear Concerns
FAQs

14 March 2011

Question: What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies?
Answer: Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.


The assessment of health damage caused by Chernobyl and Fukushima was done by the IAEA (protects nuclear power), NOT by the WHO (protecting people) – according to Alison Katz, who worked 18 years for the WHO. More:http://independentwho.info/

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdfIGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

The atomic devil strikes again – 55th IAEA General Conference 2011 Sept. 19th – 23rd:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

Effect: Only acute deaths aknowledged, 1000,000 latency deaths ingored:

4,000 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to IAEA / WHO – press paper Chernobyl forum 2005

8,930 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to Chernobyl forum 2005

7,400 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Anspaugh et al., 1988

30,000 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Goldman, 1987

18,000 (8,000 – 32,000) deaths (Europe, 1986 – 2065 without Thyroid cancer) according to Cardis et al., 2006

30,000 – 60,000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period) according to Fairley, Sumner,2006

117,000 (37,000 – 181,000) deaths (Whole world. in the period 1986 – 2056) according to Malko, 2010

317,000 – 475,000 (495,000 with Leukemia) deaths (Whole world. About the whole period. only radiocesium) according to Hofman,1994

899,000 – 1,786 000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period. only radionuclides) according to Bertell,2006

How does the IAEA think? Well, since the 1950ies science only looks for linear dose-effect correlation, when studying Low-Dose Radiation effects on health. – SOURCE:http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf



The international radiation protection bodies such as ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR base their findings on the somatic damage (cancer, leukemia risks) mainly on studies of the victims of the nuclear tests of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, wo still lived in 1950. That’s right, not 1945, 1950! This study is called “T65D.” It was begun in 1950. The five years before that has not been studied. It was observed since 1950. About 800,000 Japanese people harmed by radiation, and the analysation of their causes of death.http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm and:http://www.rerf.or.jp/library/archives_e/lsstitle.html / For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extract

Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.

K.Z. Morgan, former ICRP chairman even admitted that there is NO safe level of radiation:http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false and: W.H.O. Secretary General “Margaret Chan” admits for the first time: RADIATION IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/

Article: “

Radiation always dangerous

So far, the WHO took always the same heading as the IAEA: So-called internal radiation, “in the body is enriched, not dangerous. This is now over.

“There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” said WHO Director General Margaret Chan on Wednesday during a short meeting scheduled with members of the critical “initiative for an independent WHO “. By the former Ukrainian, Russian and Western European doctors and radiation biologists, and WHO staff based initiative has been demonstrating daily about four years before the WHO Office for cancellation of the agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

So far, the WHO had always taken the position specified by the IAEA, radioactive radiation below certain limits is NOT dangerous. Chan was referring in her testimony to the internal radiation from radioactive particles – such as Iodine 131, Cesium 137, Strontium 90, plutonium – they are being absorbed through food, water or air into the body and are deposited in the thyroid, bones or internal organs and continue radiation.

These particles are, after numerous studies by independent scientists who carried out since the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in April 1986, responsible for up to 95 percent of all cancers caused by radiation and genetic changes. The WHO has denied the internal radiation up to today, and in all statements regarding potential health risks only to external radiation – based and related measurements with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 – for example by a passing by radioactive cloud.

Chan distanced himself from Chernobyl sayings of the WHO

Chan distanced itself from the recent statements made by the WHO on the consequences of Chernobyl. “I personally do not believe that the nuclear accident in Chernobyl has claimed only 50 lives,” WHO Director-General said, according to transcripts of the interview with the critic initiative. In accordance with the IAEA, the WHO official said today, as a result of the Chernobyl disaster were only 52 people died and irradiated up to 6,000 more infected with thyroid cancer. These figures also took over the UN Commission of Atomic Scientists, and finally published in February this year.

Notwithstanding the correction of previous positions Chan insisted on and got to look at the current nuclear disaster in Fukushima “fully recognized its responsibility,” the WHO. And this “without restriction by the bilateral agreements with the IAEA in 1959.” Chan defended against the critics, too, that the WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, she and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

WHO has, however, Fukushima-measurement results under wraps

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. Chan said the WHO would be the CTBTO measurement data “publish only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”. At the same time admitted the Director-General, that “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France:http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

WHO hushed Chernobyl Conference documents

Today in the WHO Geneva headquarters, only a single radiation biologist. Chan said the “Initiative for an independent WHO” to “investigate what happened to the documents of 2001, organized jointly with the IAEA Chernobyl conference in Kiev,” she wanted. So far, the WHO claims falsely that the documents had been published in full.

In fact, only a brief summary was published. Of the more than 700 documents of the first Chernobyl conference, conducted in 1995 jointly by WHO and IAEA in Geneva, have been published to date, only twelve. The IAEA had prevailed, citing the agreement with the WHO, the then WHO Director-General Nakashima been confirmed in a television interview.



“Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.”

SOURCE:

English:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45059/2011-09-20pressreleasefoodwatch_IPPNW_EN_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiation_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45038/2011-09-20Backgroundfoodwatch_IPPNWStrahlenschutznachFukushima_EN_ger.pdf

French:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45039/radioactive_reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45055/2011-09-20communiquedepressefoodwatch_IPPNW_FR_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45056/2011-09-20contextefoodwatch_IPPNWcontaminationradioactive_FR_ger.pdf

Japanese:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45057/foodwatch_IPPNW_Report_Sep2011_jp_final_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45058/2011-09-20_PM_jp_ger.pdf

German:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44978/KalkulierterStrahlentod_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45041/2011-09-20Hintergrund_Grenzwerte_EU-Verordnungen_Messwerte_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45041/2011-09-20Hintergrund_Grenzwerte_EU-Verordnungen_Messwerte_ger.pdf



Prof. Jacobi – Director of the Institute for Radiation Protection of the Society for Radiation and Environmental Research Ltd. Munich (http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/04/091/4091257.pdf) – Neaherbergm, said in his speech from March 3rd 1973, that he is representing a maximum acceptable radiation risk of the population (without asking them!) and assumed that a civilizational radiation risk exists only when it is visible. The risk would be only low (and therefore should be acceptable and useful), that in the existing natural (spontaneous) frequency of cancer of the total population it would be not detected! For Germany, it seemed (in 2350 spontaneous cancer deaths per million inhabitants), a maximum of ten deaths per year and per million inhabitants is ACCEPTABLE! That makes (80 million people in Germany) 800 cancer deaths by nuclear power stations per year, ACCEPTABLE! Is this still a democracy? Such a drug might would have never get the permission to come on the market! But it is nuclear energy, which is allowed! Thus ANY MURDER WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE, because people die anyway! More:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/low-radiation-kills-everything-trees-children-green-energy-peace-climate-democracy-mind-science/

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells:http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-20… – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction.

The architecture of peaceful murder: Each cooling pipe shall possess a safety valve that has the purpose of automatically releasing any excess steam pressure. The crucial point is that these valves are located above the reactor lid and below the cargo front. Regarding Chernobyl: And you have seen that has raised shortly before the first explosion the lid of the fuel vapor channels. There was a nuclear explosion. Source: Robert Green, Hinkley Point in 1990, Don Arnott (chemist), Richard Webb (engineer for nuclear physics). These valves are there, that there is no congestion and pressure, which could allow the reactor to explode. The atomic eugenic industry needs these security systems: The reactor is used to emit mutagenic and lethal gases.



So, we can ask questions and make thoughts:

Valery Legasov’s suicide – who led the IAEA delegation in 1986 and whose report on Chernobyl was ignored by the IAEA. Background: http://books.google.de/books?id=xAwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=valery+legasov+IAEA+1986&source=bl&ots=vueR91HtwF&sig=8l3T3WxsPGaICvvB_sdn1A-7B6c&hl=de&ei=7SKHTtGAFcS78gO30Z1Y&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CF0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=valery%20legasov%20IAEA%201986&f=false – What did he find out? Why he killed himself?

Ross Hesketh:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ross-hesketh-549777.html – Jack Harris “Central Electricity Generating Board nuclear metallurgist” accepts the view of his colleague Ross Hesketh of the nuclear explosion in Chernobyl: Page 7http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

Don Arnotthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/jan/13/guardianobituaries – supported the model of the atomic explosion at Chernobyl

Forgotten:http://www.nzine.co.nz/features/rob_green3.html Robert Green spoke at the IPPNW 1996 Chernobyl congress.

Why is the IAEA based in Austria, where the construction of nuclear reactors is prohibited by law? The International Atomic Energy Association – adress: Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria. AND: In 1978 Austria in a referendum voted against the utilisation of nuclear power for energy generation:http://www.umweltnet.at/article/articleview/69109/1/1458. By the way: The WHO has to date the results of measurements of Fukushima under wraps. The IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere. The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, also has access to the measurement results of the CTBTO.

Gentler Fascism: Quality Management – today found everywhere – is important to keep problems, accidents, incidents In the system / company / company / group, and not making them public. Regulation and supervision was born where the criteria were very strict: Intelligence agencies, aerospace companies, research, nuclear industry, military… This is now increasingly becoming a threat. For freedom and health.

I witnessed the change in Belarus also. Exactly from the moment on, when the construcion contract of the new belarusian atomic power plant was signed (March 2011, during Fukushima explosion) Belarus stumpled into a hyperinflation. The bad economic situation created an increase of monitoring of belarusians by KGB and Police. Many belarusian friends told me, that when you go shopping, after work, doors are closed and suddelny civil police asks you for your ID. You have to tell them where you work. And even if it is your freetime they phone your work giver and ask him. Although you did nothing wrong, your work giver will have a chat with you the next day. This is senseless, criminal, but effective. Everywhere there are registration books, where people write down when you come and when you go. Even in kindergarten. The new reactor is a threat to all democratic development in Belarus. Belarus has become a hostage to Russia, because Russia’s ROSATOM is building it. Belarus got a credit of more than 2 billion Dollars by Russia, to pay the reactor. Then, three months later, got a credit by the IWF. Neither the construction nor the maintenance nor the operation nor the fuel cycle is self controlled by Belarus. It’s totally owned by Russia and it’s company ROSATOM. In Japan: TEPCO can irradiate hundreds of thousands or millions of people – it is protected by the state and even praised by the IAEA – the servant of the military and atomic industry:http://www.independentwho.info/ What will happen with the democracy in Japan? This is the situation in Belarus right now: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

Excerpt from hard to get paper “The Main Scientific Reports” – International Congress “The World after Chernobyl” Minsk (Belarus), 1996 – by russian atomic physicist in the former Soviet Union, Prof. Vassili Nesterenko (BELRAD Institute, Minsk: http://www.belrad-institute.org/) He was one of the last independet scientists in Belarus and a liquidator during the Chernobyl catastrophe (atomic reactor explosion in 1986). Belarus adapted a program in the mid 90ies which calls irradiated areas of 1 – 5 C/km² as clean and stopped money. The same happens in JAPAN:

Gentler Dictatorship: When Lukashenko (Belarus) came into power, he lifted the evacuation zones in 1994 / 1995 (http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/62.jpg), just like Japan’s new PM Noda :http://www.euronews.net/2011/09/30/20-30-km-exclusion-zone-lifted-around-fukushima/ But this happend 8 years after the Chernobyl explosions! In Japan it was done 6 months after the Fukushima explosions! Whole program: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdfand: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

July 12th 2011:

Minami Soma city is asking all the evacuees to come back to their land:
http://mainichi.jp/area/yamagata/news/20110712ddlk06040136000c.html

Sept. 30th 2011:

20 – 30 km evacuation zone around Fukushima lifted:http://www.euronews.net/2011/09/30/20-30-km-exclusion-zone-lifted-around-fukushima/

MORE:

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nuclear-energy-takes-you-as-hostage/



“Even if there was this type of accident every

year,…I would consider nuclear power to be a

valid source of energy.”

—Morris Rosen, then Head of Department of

Nuclear Safety of the Vienna-based

International Atomic Energy Agency, August 1986:http://www.ippnw.org/pdf/chernobyl-human-tragedy-for-generations.pdf

—————————————————-

Is shutting down reactors are solution? Technically, yes, ethically and medically -> only conditionally. For the development of the species, it is too late.

What has been done can not be undone, even if ALL reactors are shut dow: Increased mutation rates (insects, small mammals, humans, mutation means: cancer after generations, diseases, disabilities), less chance of healthy newborns, , increased impotence and infertility, leukemia. The species has been changed, the damage in the DNA, for eternity. Even if the half-lifes are gone in some distant future. Then you can safely shut down the nuclear power plants and sell it as a victory of reason.. After a certain predetermined plan of course. The atomic philosophy of eugenics: You can shut down the reactors. But not the half-lives. Not the modification of your DNA. Not the pre-programmed mutations and the principle of autosomal recessive modes of inheritance. Alltogether, your children will become sick or not viable. We are the culprits, perpetrators, but we created based on energy, like radio-iodine, which quickly disappears. A dose-response relationship which is not linear, is rejected by our science. We created it, the murdering peaceful atom. Powered by the United Nations. Radiation protection recommendations and commissions are our strategy for socially acceptable, slow, clean mass murder.

The banks were and are supporters of this genetic clean out: http://www.nuclearbanks.org/

—-

Atomic reactors are SLOW MOTION atomic bombs.