Blog Archive

Sunday, 31 March 2013

This from FB.. Corium quake?


 












^^ Location



















^^^Sea temperatures.....


Velocity of it...
^^
Velocity

 Ground movement...
^^
Ground movement

Photo

^^
 
 Green is not the earth....
 

Defined CORIUM-MADE quake !!!
Defined CORIUM-MADE quake !!!


Link to real time Japanese Rad map...

Friday, 29 March 2013

Tepco to start the hot test of ALPS, the multiple nuclide purification system on 3/30/2013

 


Tepco is going to start the hot test on one of the systems of ALPS, the multiple nuclide purification system on 3/30/2013.

for those interested YOU CANNOT REMOVE radionucliotides... they simply exist... anything else is a myth.

You may, 'absorb' some with certain substances, such as Boride/ Borox, but it still has the radioactive elements within them... the question is ..... where do you put that?


 read more here.....

TEPCO takes blame for Fukushima nuclear crisis

 

TEPCO takes blame for Fukushima nuclear crisisThe No. 1 and No. 2 reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant are seen in this December 2012 photo. AP Photo/Itsuo Inouye
TOKYO —
The utility that operates Japan’s crippled atomic plant said Friday that it deserves most of the blame for the country’s nuclear crisis, in its strongest remarks about its own shortcomings.
Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) acknowledged in a report that it was not adequately prepared to deal with the massive earthquake and tsunami that ravaged northeastern Japan in March 2011. The twin disasters cut power at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, causing meltdowns at three reactors. Massive radiation leaks contaminated air, water and soil around the plant, forcing about 160,000 residents to evacuate.
“Our safety culture, skills and ability were all insufficient,” TEPCO President Naomi Hirose told a news conference. “We must humbly accept our failure to prevent the accident, which we should have avoided by using our wisdom and human resources to be better prepared.”
<end snip>

Bit late now really.......

http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/tepco-takes-blame-for-fukushima-nuclear-crisis?utm_campaign=jt_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_source=jt_newsletter_2013-03-30_AM

Re: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links Mochizuki Cheshire Iori


Shizuoka prefecture to quit radiation monitoring of school lunch in 3 cities


From this April, the board of education in Shizuoka is going to quit the radiation test for school lunch in 3 cities, Fuji, yaizu, and Nishiizu cho.

Related article..56% of the evacuees in Naha have thyroid abnormality

15 minutes ago ·
  • On 3/28/2013, Tokaimura local government in Ibaraki announced 98 of 410 children were required to have the follow-up inspection from the thyroid test, 2 of 410 were required to have the detailed examination.

    Tokaimura is in 113 km South West from Fukushima plant. From 11. 2012 to 1. 2013, the local government conducted the thyroid test for 410 of 1~ 6 y.o children to reassure the parents.

    Nodules (>5mm) or cyst (>20mm) : 2 people
    Nodules (≦5mm) or cyst (≦20mm) : 98 people

    Total : 410

    Though about 24% of the children were required to have the follow-up test, they have to wait for 3 years until they have the second test.



    Related article..56% of the evacuees in Naha have thyroid abnormality [URL]

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Two years after the Fukushima nuclear disaster is Japan facing a cancer time bomb?

<snip>

TWO years after the Fukushima nuclear disaster local children are showing signs of cancer, prompting cries of a cover-up.


LEGACY-No-one-knows-how-the-Fukushima-disaster-will-affect-the-health-of-the-area-s-children
LEGACY: No one knows how the Fukushima disaster will affect the health of the area's children
IN the shadow of the Fukushima nuclear power station life appears to have returned to normal. A farmer tends his cows and goes about his daily routine as dogs play round his feet. Signs of spring are everywhere and birds sing. But take a closer look and it's all a sham.

The rice fields are overgrown with weeds as tall as a man. The rest of this village, near the scene of the world's worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, is deserted. Washing still hanging on lines hints at the panic which engulfed this region of Japan.

The farmer is among a handful of people who defied an order by the authorities to evacuate. Beef from this area was once prized for its taste and quality but his cows, which graze within sight of the chimneys of the plant, should have been slaughtered and are now worthless.

Two years after an earthquake and tsunami caused a meltdown in the reactors at Fukushima, releasing clouds of radiation, the world has moved on.

Officially the mass evacuation was a success and the prompt action of a heroic band of workers at the crippled plant averted a nuclear catastrophe. No one has so far died as a result of radiation from Fukushima, insist the authorities. However there are growing concerns that the full scale of the disaster has yet to be seen. There are claims of complacency and a cover-up. It's not the Japanese way to stage protests but there has been a series of anti-nuclear rallies in Tokyo, 160 miles south.

Most worrying are the results of tests carried out on more than 130,000 children who lived around Fukushima. More than 40 per cent have the early signs of thyroid cancer, while other forms of the disease may not become apparent for a decade.

While it's true that people living very close by were evacuated within the first few days, damage may already have been done to their health. Many more, living up to 25 miles away, were not moved away until six weeks after the radiation escaped.

It's also feared that the food chain has been contaminated. Radioactive material has been detected in a range of produce, including spinach, tea leaves, milk and beef, up to 200 miles distant. Fish caught near the plant this month were more than 5,000 times over safe radiation limits, according to Japan's state broadcaster NHK.

Then there's the daily risk of more radiation escaping from the smouldering plant, which is still not fully stable. It's being cooled with vast amounts of water but workers are running out of tanks in which to store the contaminated liquid once it has done its job.
<end snip>


and most people think it is over.........

read more here.....

 

 Time changes everything...

Soon the lies will be recognized for what they are...  a coward's way of  delaying the inevitable.

The liars will also be recognized.

 I hope the shekels will comfort them in their moral bankruptcy..  

Many have seen through the fog of obfuscation..  many more soon will.

The children cry out for justice.  May they soon have it.

 wb  

 

 

Japan may be facing cancer time bomb two years after Fukushima

 http://japandailypress.com/japan-may-be-facing-cancer-time-bomb-two-years-after-fukushima-2725901

 

It has been two years since the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami hit northeastern Japan and caused the meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear power plant – the world’s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. As the people begin to rebuild, signs of a cancer outbreak from the radiation of the troubled nuclear power station are beginning to show.

3D Rad Map Fukushima 27/03/13


Japanese response to Nuke power situation...

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

Welcome to our new Contributing Author Christine Dillon Strickland

She plays a major informational role in FB, and, as some suppose, there maybe no need to go there.
Fair enough.
To extend another voice that trails the Fukushima disaster, I open my arms and welcome her as a contrtibuting author.

Thank you.

 

This shows how ordinary Japanese people looking at Fukushima Daiichi Jeopardy.

This shows how ordinary Japanese people looking at Fukushima Daiichi Jeopardy.

Shared from Takashi Hosoe;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AcQJE_R0iw

Like · · · · 5 hours ago

Analysis of time releases from Fukushima by Christine Dillon Strickland and Paul Langley

This is a pretty impressive "map" of the lies we were told and when were told them and by whom... and pretty ironclad proof that spent fuel pool four was indeed on fire.

Paul Langley
3 hours ago ·
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CGgQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmeetingorganizer.copernicus.org%2FEGU2013%2FEGU2013-3793-3.pdf&ei=U7lRUZWFHoiZiAfro4HwDA&usg=AFQjCNFIEWYwolYGu-MDsgOsRsvpvGK_QQ&bvm=bv.44158598%2Cd.aGc&cad=rja
16Unlike · · Unfollow Post · Share
You like this.

Paul Langley ^ The time series analysis of the radionuclide emissions from ...
meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2013/EGU2013-3793-3.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The time series analysis of the radionuclide emissions from Fukushima. Daiichi nuclear power plant by online global ...
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley " The analysis
period was 40 days, from 11 March to 19 April. We tested two prior emission information. The first information
was JAEA posterior emission (Chino et al., 2011) and the second was NILU prior emission (not posterior) (Stohl
et al.,2011) as our observation data were almost similar to their study.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley The maximum radio nuclei emission occurred
during 15 March, which was larger than prior information."
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley 15 March 2011.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley fuel pool 4
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Let's look at the IAEA status report for 15 March 2011 shall we?
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley drum roll.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley I need a coffee.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima150311.html

Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update Log
www.iaea.org
Japanese authorities have informed the IAEA that the evacuation of the population from the 20-kilometre zone around Fukushima Daiichi has been successfully completed.
3 hours ago · Like

Paul Langley ^ Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update (15 March 2011, 07:35 UTC)

Japanese authorities have confirmed that the fire at the spent fuel storage pond at the Unit 4 reactor of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was extinguished on 15 March at 02:00 UTC.

Please note that all future communications from the IAEA regarding events in Japan will use the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) standard.

The IAEA continues to liaise with the Japanese authorities and is monitoring the situation as it evolves.
Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update (15 March 2011, 05:15 UTC)

Japanese authorities informed the IAEA that there has been an explosion at the Unit 2 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. The explosion occurred at around 06:20 on 15 March local Japan time.

Japanese authorities also today informed the IAEA at 04:50 CET that the spent fuel storage pond at the Unit 4 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is on fire and radioactivity is being released directly into the atmosphere.

Dose rates of up to 400 millisievert per hour have been reported at the site. The Japanese authorities are saying that there is a possibility that the fire was caused by a hydrogen explosion.

The IAEA is seeking further information on these developments.

The IAEA continues to liaise with the Japanese authorities and is monitoring the situation as it evolves.
Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update (15 March 2011, 02:35 UTC)

Japanese authorities yesterday reported to the IAEA at 20:05 UTC that the reactors Units 1, 2 and 3 of the Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant are in cold shutdown status. This means that the pressure of the water coolant is at around atmospheric level and the temperature is below 100 °C. Under these conditions, the reactors are considered to be safely under control.

Japanese authorities have also informed the IAEA that teams of experts from Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the plant's operator, are working to restore cooling in the reactor Unit 4 and bring it to cold shutdown.

The IAEA continues to liaise with the Japanese authorities and is monitoring the situation as it evolves.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Christine Dillon Strickland cold shutdown of unit 4? huh??
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Lets look at the 16th. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima160311.html

Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update Log
www.iaea.org
Spent fuel that has been removed from a nuclear reactor generates intense heat and is typically stored in a water-filled spent fuel pool to cool it and provide protection from its radioactivity. Water in a spent fuel pool is continuously cooled to remove heat produced by spent fuel assemblies. Acco...
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update (16 March 2011, 22:00 UTC)

Temperature of Spent Fuel Pools at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Spent fuel that has been removed from a nuclear reactor generates intense heat and is typically stored in a water-filled spent fuel pool to cool it and provide protection from its radioactivity. Water in a spent fuel pool is continuously cooled to remove heat produced by spent fuel assemblies. According to IAEA experts, a typical spent fuel pool temperature is kept below 25 °C under normal operating conditions. The temperature of a spent fuel pool is maintained by constant cooling, which requires a constant power source.

Given the intense heat and radiation that spent fuel assemblies can generate, spent fuel pools must be constantly checked for water level and temperature. If fuel is no longer covered by water or temperatures reach a boiling point, fuel can become exposed and create a risk of radioactive release. The concern about the spent fuel pools at Fukushima Daiichi is that sources of power to cool the pools may have been compromised.

The IAEA can confirm the following information regarding the temperatures of the spent nuclear fuel pools at Units 4, 5 and 6 at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant:
Unit 4
14 March, 10:08 UTC: 84 °C
15 March, 10:00 UTC: 84 °C
16 March, 05:00 UTC: no data
Unit 5
14 March, 10:08 UTC: 59.7 °C
15 March, 10:00 UTC: 60.4 °C
16 March, 05:00 UTC: 62.7 °C
Unit 6
14 March, 10:08 UTC: 58.0 °C
15 March, 10:00 UTC: 58.5 °C
16 March, 05:00 UTC: 60.0 °C
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley OIC, Cold shut down at Unit 4 occurs apparently when the temp data for that pool = no data.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley funny things arent they.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley How can you have a cold shut of an empty shut down reactor for christs sake. Or am I being too Australian?
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Normal operating temp is 25Celius.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley blog post.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley this appears to be genuine: http://nuclearhistory.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/iaea-150311.jpg

http://nuclearhistory.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/iaea-150311.jpg
nuclearhistory.files.wordpress.com
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley I submit that the fire in fuel pool 4, where a fire of the zirc or not, resulted in damage to the fuel rods and as confirmed now by numerous sources, caused a grave threat to be unleashed. The emergency ramped up. After spending the day trying to rev...See More
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley It is all very suspicious.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley I'm still trying to work it out. If it can be shown that the emissions from the fuel pool at No 4 traveled further than current NRC predictions indicate, we are back at WASH and the current predictive model is out the window.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley While the IAEA was keen to inform member states, not one news agency carried the actual IAEA emergency notice. And today many pro nuke sites claim no fire occurred in the fuel pool.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley However, the list of confirmations is very long: http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/iaea-fukushima-nuclear-accident-update-15-march-2011-1410-utc/

IAEA Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update (15 March 2011, 14:10 UTC)
nuclearhistory.wordpress.com
scattered throughout the net are many sources which deny that a fire occurred at Reactor four on 14 March 2011 (UTC). The previous post gives sources for the reports that a fire in Spent Fuel Pool ...
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley The single worst day for emissions from Fuk was the 15 March 2011. And it is certain that the reason for this was damage to the fuel rods in spent fuel pool number 4, which experienced a fire. The nature of the fire is not disclosed in the documents presented by the IAEA. Though we know from NRC transcripts that the lack of water in SFP 4 was debated heavily between NRC and Japan.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley this guy of course claims that there was never a danger posed by sfp 4. However, regardless of what was going on regard to the water level, the fact is there was a fire in the pool. http://atomicinsights.com/2012/10/oak-ridge-researchers-prove-fukushima-unit-4-spent-fuel-pool-never-a-danger.html

Oak Ridge researchers prove Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel pool NEVER a danger - Atomic Insights
atomicinsights.com
The temperature in the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 spent fuel pool never exceeded 90 degrees C and the level in the pool never fell below the top of the used
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Now, let us assume, that the fire in the pool was caused by events external to the pool. ie that it was not a zirc fire. Let's say diesel fuel fell into the pool and burned away, triggered by the H explosion which was related to No 3. No matter how m...See More
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Its for a guy with nothing much to do to have a hobby. Keeps his hands busy so let's leave the blogger himself to his usual activities and refer to the paper his cites. : http://www.new.ans.org/pubs/journals/nt/a_14634

ANS / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Technology / Volume 180 / Number 2 / Pages 205-215
www.new.ans.org
Dean Wang, Ian C. Gauld, Graydon L. Yoder, Larry J. Ott, George F. Flanagan, Matthew W. Francis, Emilian L. Popov, Juan J. Carbajo, Prashant K. Jain, John C. Wagner, Jess C. Gehin
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Well, the record shows the fire did occur and that the fuel pool 4 did cause a spike in emissions which completely changed the nature of the accident's emissions.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Un fractionated fission and fuel particle release direct into the air as a direct result of nuclear power. At this point Japan issued Potassium Iodine tablets.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley At this point, the Japanese prime minister told people to stay indoors and shut their doors and windows.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley The earlier Iodine and cesium releases (to be kind) paled comparison to what was released on 15 March 2011. Mr Cook, it was emitted by sfp No 4.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Paul Langley Of course if such thing did occur on a nuclear sub Mr Cook, we wouldnt get to hear about it. The Thresher is a long way down.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Christine Dillon Strickland They DID issue the iodine to the local governments, however; the local governments in MOST cases did not distribute it to the populations... and considering that stable iodine is most effective when given 36 hours prior to the iodine cloud reaching you? It was too late too little and I believe is going to bring about the worst wave of thyroid cancers this world has ever been witness to.
5 minutes ago · Like

Chernobyl Children Fukushima Children I can not believe in such a small amount. CTBTO does not detect radionuclides in sea.
3 minutes ago · Unlike · 1

Christine Dillon Strickland But WOW! Recall most of us were not aware IAEA was even making reports until sometime into the accident, so most of us did not see the ones that you have unearthed here. I am in shock. Thank you so much for following this thing down the rabbit hole. You do amazing work Paul Langley and I am at your service any way I CAN be.
3 minutes ago · Like

Christine Dillon Strickland I am positive whatever numbers are reported by the Japanese government we can multiply by at a minimum of 10 times, at the very least.
2 minutes ago · Like

The time series analysis of the radionuclide emissions from Fukushima

Geophysical Research Abstracts

Vol. 15, EGU2013-3793-3, 2013

EGU General Assembly 2013

© Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License.


The time series analysis of the radionuclide emissions from Fukushima

Daiichi nuclear power plant by online global chemistry transport model

and inverse model


Takashi Maki, Taichu Tanaka, Mizuo Kajino, Tsuyoshi Sekiyama, Yasuhito Igarashi, and Masao Mikami


Meteorological Research Institute, Japan (tmaki@mri-jma.go.jp)


The accident of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant that occurred in March 2011 emitted a large amount of

radionuclide. The important feature of this accident was that the source position was evidently clear, however, time

and vertical emission variations were unknown (in this case, it was known that the height of emission was not so

high in altitude). In such a case, the technique of inverse model was a powerful tool to gain answers to questions;

high resolution and more precise analysis by using prior emission information with relatively low computational

cost are expected to be obtainable. Tagged simulation results by global aerosol model named MASINGAR (Tanaka

et al., 2005) were used; the horizontal resolution was TL319 (about 60 km). Tagged tracers (Cs137) from lowest

model layer (surface to 100m) were released every three hours with 1Tg/hr which accumulated daily mean. 50 sites’

daily observation data in the world (CTBTO, Ro5, Berkeley, Hoffmann and Taiwan) were collected. The analysis

period was 40 days, from 11 March to 19 April. We tested two prior emission information. The first information

was JAEA posterior emission (Chino et al., 2011) and the second was NILU prior emission (not posterior) (Stohl

et al.,2011) as our observation data were almost similar to their study. Due to consideration for observation error

and space representation error, the observation error was set as 20%. Several sensitivity tests were examined by

changing prior emission flux uncertainties. As a result, Cs137 estimated the total emission amount from 11 March

to 19 April as 18.5PBq with the uncertainty of 3.6PBq. Moreover, the maximum radio nuclei emission occurred

during 15 March, which was larger than prior information. The precision of the analysis was highly dependent on

observation data (quantity and quality) and precision of transport model. Possibility to obtain robust result by using

multi-model ensemble results with inverse model was also considered. The results of this study are available for

modification of many processes of aerosol transport models. In the future, the combination of regional chemistry

transport model and higher time resolution observation data in order to obtain robust emission time series of

radionuclide is being planned.

Re: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links



 [link to www.foxnews.com]
Quoting: zvezda 1


Very bad situation. Many of those tanks are
single-walled with a 20 year lifespan, which is long expired.
Quoting: Waterbug


Yep, they will screw around till something really terrible happens. This is the ugly part no one wants to face about this power source - Storage FOREVER.
"Well-behaved women seldom make history." —Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. ~Edward Everett Hale
 

Monday, 25 March 2013

"I never imagined to feel this nervous to touch my throat until 2 years ago.
I check my thyroid, lymph and symptoms of other things that I don’t even want to mention the names.
My feet feel a little bit sweaty to be nervous.

I was exposed in the first week. It’s irreversible. Not so many people can share this feeling in the world.

When I was a teenager, there was a time when my family member died, and we moved to a new house and I had a term‐end examination. I learnt how much stress affects my ability of concentration.

Now it’s not even comparable. I’m not even in my country, and keep moving all the time.
Nothing guarantees my life and health for tomorrow.
but when I knew the reactor3 probably had a nuclear explosion and all the mass media concealed it, I thought I had to move and do something for the truth. It wasn’t a decision to need me to be courageous, it was the only way for me to go."


http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/03/column-we-all-need-to-try-something-new/




Saturday, 23 March 2013

Survey results #1 (OK rectifying C and P).....

When TEPCO (power company) and the Japanese Government installed safe gaurds did you feel they were satisfactory?
  • Answered: 24
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
4.17%
1
No
91.67%
22
Unsure
4.17%
1
Total 24
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q2

When the situation elevated, did you believe their were multiple melt downs?

  • Answered: 24
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
95.83%
23
No
4.17%
1
Unsure
0%
0
Total 24
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q3

When TEPCO and the Japanese Government released news of a 'State of Cold Shutdown' did you find this acceptable in the release of known conditions?

  • Answered: 24
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
8.33%
2
No
83.33%
20
Unsure
8.33%
2
Total 24
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q4

Do you understand the nature and amount of irradiological releases to the present day?

  • Answered: 25
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
56.00%
14
No
28.00%
7
Unsure
16%
4
Total 25
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q5

Do you feel that the situation is harmful to the inhabitants around the concerned area?

  • Answered: 25
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
96%
24
No
4%
1
Unsure
0%
0
Total 25
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q6

Do you feel that all attempts are being made to rectify the said problem?

  • Answered: 25
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
16%
4
No
76%
19
Unsure
8%
2
Total 25
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q7

Do you consider the Fukushima incident as an on going crisis?

  • Answered: 25
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
96%
24
No
4%
1
Unsure
0%
0
Total 25
Export
COMING SOON...
Analyze BETA isn't 100% complete yet. We're still working on a few features. So, if you need to export or share your survey data, you'll need to switch back to Classic Analyze.
Got Feedback?
Q8

Is there a particular peronal statement you would like to make?

  • Answered: 7
  • Skipped: 18

D
PRO FEATURE
Use text analysis to search and categorize responses; see frequently-used words and phrases.
Categorize as... Filter by Category
Showing 7 responses 
      
Get your shit together
3/25/2013 10:37 AMView respondent's answers
We have proof from day one that we were being lied to. I myself have TWO BOOKS filled with the early daily TEPCO & IAEA reports, including the test sample reports and other research. The lies we were being fed even from the beginning has ALWAYS been nothing less than an insulting blow to my intelligence, and, rights as a human being on this planet. I would like these perpetrators and enablers of deceit in Fukushima, in the IAEA, and, in EVERY nuclear research facility or regulatory agency for the past 80 years to know that the destruction of this planet and it's inhabitants is in their hands. The irony is the very fact that they do not view their folly and deceit as anything more than the 'way things work.' Between the nuclear industry and chemical companies like Dow and Monsanto, the day is coming that the Earth will be largely populated by genetically and physically flawed humans of questionable health and intelligence who will have lowered ability to keep humanity intact. I'd like to know when truth will surface. Fish and other sea food is no longer safe, many produce and food products from the West Coast of North America have been affected. I am sad to be afraid to be outside when it rains...which was one of my lifelong pleasures. Our planet is being bombarded by an irreversible assault in Japan, but, THAT is the one they COULD NOT HIDE. It is time for the blanket end of Nuclear Power plants worldwide. Just because this industries lobbyists and crafty 'scientists' mange to skew data, bury incidents, and, perpetuate lies to convince the world their industry is safe, does not make it safe. Which plant will be next? The age and structural integrity of existing plants are already reasons for grave concerns, but, as the incidents --yes, more than one-- in Japan show, the nuclear power industry always manages to do and say what it wants. One look at the pictures of those 'happy Japanese farmers'' 'proudly' holding up their grossly enlarged produce with a smiling face IS PROOF that they are/have been from the start trying to condition the world to believe that Fukushima is safe. The hopes and futures of people worldwide has been compromised, while we must live with the fact that we continue to be lied to. Those in power have lost all credibility. Civilization is broken, trust is lost, and it's only a matter of time until the silent sins of this industry is the visible face of mankind. I am beyond sad, and mourn for us all.
                              
3/25/2013 10:32 AMView respondent's answers
we are destroying our planet for the sake of money. We need to stop.
                              
3/25/2013 10:23 AMView respondent's answers
AREA-51 has the technology and anti-gravity craft to remove the melted cores and fly them into the sun. But the ETs that control Earth are mean. Please watch all of this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3VwxXlfh0E
                              
3/25/2013 10:04 AMView respondent's answers
Wake up! This is an Extinction Level Event in the making!
                              
3/25/2013 9:56 AMView respondent's answers
A realistic and TRUTHFUL prognosis needs to be outlined by appropriate agencies. More reliable, TRUTHFUL and comprehensive monitoring of radioactive release is needed going forward. Current extent of entire range of affected biosystems needs to be annunciated.
                              
3/25/2013 9:26 AMView respondent's answers
The Japanese authorities and the Nuclear Industry leaders must be tried for crimes against Humankind at La Haya (or wherever). They are nothing but mass murderers. I hate them.
                              
3/7/2013 7:39 PMView respondent's answers
Export
From which demographic do you belong?
  • Answered: 19
  • Skipped: 6
Name:
84.21%
16
Company:
0%
0
Address 1:
0%
0
Address 2:
0%
0
City/Town:
0%
0
State/Province:
89.47%
17
ZIP/Postal Code:
0%
0
Country:
100%
19
Email Address:
0%
0
Phone Number:
0%
0
Total Respondents: 19

Where you aware at the time of incident of the Fukushima Nuclear plant Disaster melt/downs?
  • Answered: 25
  • Skipped: 0
 
Yes
88%
22
No
4%
1
Was Not Aware at the time
8%
2
Total